Pat wrote:Just a thought. .22 ammo does not store all that well, unlike most centerfire stuff. Shoot it up!
Pat wrote:According to my father, the general rule was always to get all you can before the hoarders come...
Pat wrote:According to my father, the general rule was always to get all you can before the hoarders come...
Pat wrote:According to my father, the general rule was always to get all you can before the hoarders come...
Pat wrote:Just a thought. .22 ammo does not store all that well, unlike most centerfire stuff. Shoot it up!
marko wrote:I'll remain skeptical on that claim. In my Mausers, all I shoot is 1938-1941 ammo, never a hitch. Now .22 ammo with an enclosed primer is surely more resistant to the elements that would hurt a primer, right? The only Ammo I ever had a problem with is the VZ52 ammo that the whole and about only shpment from Czechloslovakia got wet. With rust and wet primers, about 60% go bang, had that been primerless rimfire, I'm sure it all would still fire.
What happens in the basement stays in the basement.
marko wrote:I'll remain skeptical on that claim. In my Mausers, all I shoot is 1938-1941 ammo, never a hitch. Now .22 ammo with an enclosed primer is surely more resistant to the elements that would hurt a primer, right? The only Ammo I ever had a problem with is the VZ52 ammo that the whole and about only shpment from Czechloslovakia got wet. With rust and wet primers, about 60% go bang, had that been primerless rimfire, I'm sure it all would still fire.
mnglocker wrote:.22lr doesn't have the kind of crimp that you'll get with centerfire ammo. Unless it's in a dry box, I get failure rates of around 1-3% on bulk .22lr after 6months.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests