Holland&Holland wrote:Then please don’t use terms like “notable members” for left wing troll plants. He caved on bump stocks I get it.
Yes, it would be awesome to a roll back of NFA on suppressors. Considering what European countries do for them, it should be feasible as a hearing safety bill.
bstrawse wrote:Probably nothing.
We'll get conservative, fairly Pro-2A judges on the whole.
Beyond that, likely nothing.
Lumpy wrote:bstrawse wrote:Probably nothing.
We'll get conservative, fairly Pro-2A judges on the whole.
Beyond that, likely nothing.
So perhaps the question is, what can people working for the Republican Party do to advance the pro-gun agenda within the party? What might people at the precinct caucus level, or functionaries within the Party apparatus do to lobby the issue? The leadership knows full well that they've got the pro-gun vote sewed up and realistically there's nowhere they can defect to. So how do we get the 'Pubs to care more about the gun owners than the swing voters who might be alienated by a pro-2nd Amendment stance?
atomic41 wrote:Bring back the Hearing Protection Act and National Reciprocity that Paul Ryan killed. If I'm not mistaken, Trump has said he would like to do that at rally speeches.
atomic41 wrote:Bring back the Hearing Protection Act and National Reciprocity that Paul Ryan killed. If I'm not mistaken, Trump has said he would like to do that at rally speeches.
Markemp wrote:atomic41 wrote:Bring back the Hearing Protection Act and National Reciprocity that Paul Ryan killed. If I'm not mistaken, Trump has said he would like to do that at rally speeches.
This would be nice but it probably conflicts with his tee time.
Markemp wrote:atomic41 wrote:Bring back the Hearing Protection Act and National Reciprocity that Paul Ryan killed. If I'm not mistaken, Trump has said he would like to do that at rally speeches.
This would be nice but it probably conflicts with his tee time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests