Firearms Companies Restricting Sales To GOVERNMENT Agencies

[JohnC]

A growing number of firearm and firearm-related companies have stated they will no longer sell items to states, counties, cities and municipalities that restrict their citizens' rights to own them.

According to The Police Loophole, 34 companies have joined in publicly stating that governments who seek to restrict 2nd Amendment rights will themselves be restricted from purchasing the items they seek to limit or ban.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-wi ... cies-areas

[Maniac117]

[harryset]

The number was up to 42 yesterday morning, and up to 44 by afternoon. A couple of big companies joining in on this one.

[harryset]

67 verified and climbing as of Friday, 2-22-13

[ex-LT]

67 verified and climbing as of Friday, 2-22-13

I saw an article this morning that had the number at 70 as of 2/24.

The number is now up to 79.

[damian_mb]

79, wow!!!

[gp55445]

Magpul is very disappointing...http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/02/daniel-zimmerman/magpul-breaks-bad-continues-sales-to-ban-state-leos/

[JohnGageMN]

Magpul is very disappointing...http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/02/daniel-zimmerman/magpul-breaks-bad-continues-sales-to-ban-state-leos/

Magpul has since changed their stance, at least according to the company prez...

http://www.ncgunblog.com/2013/03/01/mag ... k-boycott/

REGARDING LEO SALES

March 1st, 2013

Back in 1990, when I was deployed in Desert Shield and Desert Storm as a Marine grunt, some companies prioritized me items for my M16 for shipping that I purchased with my own funds. After getting out and forming Magpul in 1999, I established the same priority policy for Military and Law Enforcement, due to the requirements of their profession.

The same policy has been in place for 13 years now and has never been an issue until a few days ago. I do not support the idea that individual police officers should be punished for the actions of their elected officials. That said, I understand the concerns that some have with Law Enforcement officers getting special treatment while at the same time denouncing second amendment rights to another citizen in the same state.

With the fight in Colorado right now we do not have time to implement a new program, so I have suspended all LE sales to ban states until we can implement a system wherein any Law Enforcement Officer buying for duty use will have to promise to uphold their oath to the US Constitution – specifically the second and fourteenth amendments – as it applies to all citizens.

Richard Fitzpatrick

President/CEO – Founder

So IOW, Oathkeepers will eventually still be able to get theirs. While I am in general wholesale against creating special classes for anyone, I think that's one exception I can live with for now...