He isn't a terrorist. But he wants to meet with them.
rucker wrote:What do you mean "another reason"? There are tons of well well thought out reasons in that video. I mean I might vote for somebody with 1 Muslim name, maybe even 2, but NEVER for somebody with three! To make matters worse his father was Muslim! It doesn't matter that his parents got divorced when he was two years old and his dad moved back to Kenya 'cause "terrorist" is genetic! After searching out a Muslim school, a search that was most likely grueling in a country that is 86.1% Muslim, his non-Muslim mother picked up where his father left off. He was also sent to Catholic schools during his childhood in Jakarta and has chosen to attend a Christian church his entire adult life.... wait a minute how does that help my tenuous point?!?!?
A NOTE FOR GOOGLE whose omnipresent force will immortalize my words: The above text is satirical in nature.
Seriously now, I wouldn't say I agree with many, or any, of Obama's stances on real issues but I am, just a little, sick of the same mindless drivel over and over. There were some interesting things in there which I will now proceed to research. I just wish I didn't have to sit through so much crap to hear it!
JohninMinnesota wrote:You forgot the flag in his office... with Jose' Cuervo on it! And I wouldn't call Rev. Wright's church "Christian", or call many Christians I've met Christian either... but I do believe he is proponent for change that we will better off without, and I also believe we can't fight against this socialist movement hard enough.
JohninMinnesota wrote:(in my opinion) People embrace him because A) they feel "white guilt" or B) he is black and he will "represent them" - not based on his voting record, not based on his accomplishments. They like his smooth speaking style and his charisma. Not the first time someone has been voted into office on these qualities.
JohninMinnesota wrote:but I do believe he is proponent for change that we will better off without, and I also believe we can't fight against this socialist movement hard enough.
rucker wrote:What I don't agree with is the manner in which some fight and this video overdid it in my opinion.
jwinker wrote:JohninMinnesota wrote:but I do believe he is proponent for change that we will better off without, and I also believe we can't fight against this socialist movement hard enough.
Who that is left isn't a proponent of change we would be better off without???
Obama - Filling us with empty promises of puppies and rainbows.
Clinton - Her multiple personalities are getting flat-out creepy.
McCain - Economics what? War will fix the economy, right? Worked for FDR!
Paul - Big talk, but if he tried to pass his ideas he'd just become the most veto'd president in history.
So what's the point? Whoever is elected, will it really make a difference? This is much like a multiple choice test where all of the answers are wrong, but you still have to pick one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests