bensdad wrote:Heffay wrote:Greenpeace has stated that the biggest strategic error they made is opposing nuclear power. But yeah... it's not so good for transportation purposes. No matter how many nuke plants they built in the 50s and 60s, the Tesla wouldn't have been invented in the 70s.
Couldn't nuke be used to shift power use over from one source to another? Nuke for electric to heat buildings, create propane vehicles?
Heating easily. Gasoline and diesel just pack so much energy in a convenient to handle package that it's tough to find something that is equivalent. There are natural gas vehicles out there that work fine, but CNG has its own issues. The Chevy Volt is really going to be the model going forward, or if you have some sort of aversion to saying anything green or from GM is good, think diesel subs. Battery power, with gas/diesel engines to extend range.
If we had the nuke infrastructure we could have had by not getting sidetracked by "nukes are bad herpa-derpa" talk, we'd be that much further ahead of the game. Of course, we still have to wait for battery/electrical technology to catch up to where the internal combustion engine is today, but... yeah. There are many roads to get there and off of fossil fuels. And when we do, it'll help our national security posture TONS.