Rip Van Winkle wrote:Both GOA and SAF are good organizations, but I don't think either have the political clout of the NRA.
Make sure to support MN Gun Owners Caucus also.
Rip Van Winkle wrote:Both GOA and SAF are good organizations, but I don't think either have the political clout of the NRA.
Make sure to support MN Gun Owners Caucus also.
BigDog58 wrote:I'm a staunch 2A Supporter and have been my entire adult life.
I support the NRA, GOA, and SAF. We need EVERY OUNCE of 2A Advocacy we can get.
If we let the left get us infighting, among ourselves, and take our eyes off of them for even a second, they'll pass something that Infringes on our Rights. Then, we have to fight just to get back from where we already were.
Let's keep our eyes on the Anti-Gunners, and make them fight uphill, the entire time. Let's keep our hill top.
Holland&Holland wrote:Infighting is a great way to kill any movement.
Erud wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Infighting is a great way to kill any movement.
Oooh, passive-aggression! So stop fighting. Just ignore the NRA and stop sending them your money to stab you in the back. They'll go away eventually.
yukonjasper wrote:Is the Bumpstock novelty the litmus test for loyalty?
yukonjasper wrote:As I've advocated for a while, there needs to be a singular, powerfu,l focused resistance. Can we pick one and go forward? The cult of personality and lynch mob mentality hurts the overall efficacy of the movement.
yukonjasper wrote:As we seek purity, the Left forges ahead in all their imperfect, but emotional efforts.
Erud wrote:yukonjasper wrote:Is the Bumpstock novelty the litmus test for loyalty?
Yes it is, and it's also a great recent example. The NRA is a single-issue organization, and that issue is the 2nd Amendment. Why would they support any infringements, compromises, or-re-evaluations of existing favorable 2A laws/rulings? Why would you support them doing that? It doesn't matter if it's a "novelty", this is the exact opposite of what a gun rights organization should be doing. The other 2A orgs were very much against this, but the NRA as usual supported "common-sense firearms" laws.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests