I assume I can't carry there??????????
Yeah, I'll just lock her up...............
John S. wrote:I assume I can't carry there??????????
Yeah, I'll just lock her up...............
Seismic Sam wrote:I could be wrong, but I think some lawyers would have to be totally asleep not to cover that one. The hospice I work at DOES have that sign, for whatever purpose it serves, but I can't really remember if there were signs at Bethesda St. Paul or Gillette Childrens. I would assume there were until I saw otherwise with my own eyes. At Bethesda a gun was no good with the only real danger, which was an Alzheimer's patient going completely off the reservation and getting severely violent. In most of those cases, Sasha would settle those people down in 30 seconds or less, so just the concept of having a gun was a feeble joke. To look at it from the other side, what possible situation could you REASONABLY expect to run into in a hospital with 24/7 video security where you could discharge your weapon and reasonably claim fear of death or GBH??
dupa wrote:all healtheast facilities are posted.. there was an issue at bethesda with gangs steeling the sharp containers for needles a while back
dupa wrote:all healtheast facilities are posted.. there was an issue at bethesda with gangs steeling the sharp containers for needles a while back
crbutler wrote:Remember that they sold the U of MN hospitals to Fairview.
It is NOT a public owned/Government facility, despite it being on the U of MN campus.
I can't believe the number of gun rights folks around here who advocate violating someone else's property rights... geez.
Also, the government property clause is not complete. There are lots of places that are government property that firearms are banned- and rightly so. Prisons, jails, secure mental health and CD facilities, etc.
We need to be reasonable. Knee jerk reactions ("its OK if they don't catch me") etc. don't help. Look what boneheads did with the Sig Brace for how quickly reasonable things can be taken away.
jshuberg wrote:I'm not familiar with the medical facility there, but it sounds like several people agree that it's not a U of M facility. If that's the case they can prohibit carry just like any other private property.
My previous statements still apply to actual U of M facilities.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests